Conversation
Notices
-
@simsa0 even if you have the right to remove it (i doubt it), i don't think that's fair on the other people who has contributed to it
-
gnusocial admins: don't let trump move your tolerance for frisbee seeking. nazis are still nazis – block, silence, delete.
-
@hannes2peer qse's @simsa0 requested I send you this link: http://url.federati.net/CUjtO CC: @mcscx
-
@hannes2peer Concerning this I really like the TOS of gnusocial.de: https://wiki.gnusocial.de/en:gnusocialde:tos
-
@simsa0 i don't think you can do that. you wrote it collaboratively with others, and contributed it to the AGPLv3 licensed project !qvitter
-
@simsa0 i appreciate your work, but i can remove the credit/mention of you if you like.
-
@simsa0 it surprises me that you seem to have had no problem with the faq being used on slc, smuglio etc?
-
@simsa0 but i will of course remove it from the qvitter repo if someone i trust in license/copyright issues tell me i should
-
@hannes2peer for my part, I'm personally ok with the FAQ being removed, for the specific reason: 1) it's rather outdated anyway and deals with no-longer supported features like private groups and hidden accounts, 2) many parts go into too much detail or describe rather obvious things..
So the faq could IMO be removed/replaced with some other faq. However I also agree with your opinion: It can't be right if a contributor to a collaborative GPL-like work can ask to remove all their contributions any time later. This would be like Evan Prodromou or a Linux kernel developer asking to remove all their code lines from a work, 2 years later, after others have continued the work. @simsa0
-
@mcscx2 i agree, we need a better more up to date faq. but i'm worried people will get mad/sad if we suddenly remove it without replacement
-
@hannes2peer you could indeed use q.no's faq. I remember when @tom@s.karp.id.au announced working on it https://social.stormdragon.tk/conversation/96378#notice-100413
Here's the project site https://git.gnu.io/tom/social-doc
@simsa0
-
@mcscx2 it looks nice. i wish i had a higher work capacity now, so i could work on stuff like this.
-
@hannes2peer There are TOS on q.se (and many other nodes have the same) that prohibit racism, xenophobism, antisemitism etc. Accepting those terms on the one hand but trying to pull out own work if the service's admin is acting like stated in these TOS on the other hand is slightly ambivalent. To me this is a sulky reaction by @simsa0. Like the one kid who owns the ball taking it away when he's losing the soccer match.
Skratterciseterapeutens Leende
lnxw48 (Linux Walt)
Michael Vogel
mcscx2old is still alive (famous last words)
All Roland's Microblog content and data are available under the