Conversation
Notices
-
Why I don't like payed support
I currently face a #bug in #Payara that doesn't allow TABLE_PER_CLASS and I cannot change the database layout (as then the main program needs to be changed which involves a lot risky work).
I have filled out a bug report ...
[attachment type='link' url='https://github.com/payara/Payara/issues/966' title='The class does not have a descriptor, or a descriptor that does not use inheritance or uses a ClassExtractor for inheritance · Issue #966 · payara/Payara' preview='https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/470798?v=3&s=400']Severity: Blocker (see reason below)
Reproduceable: Always
This message comes with following JPQL:
SELECT c FROM AbstractFoo AS c WHERE TYPE(c) IN :types
The class is annotated with:
@Entity
@Inh...[/attachment]
But they don't want to handle it. I guess I'm not alone with this bug. I don't like such "payment model" where paying customers are priotized. I for my projects provide unpriotized support for any one, unpayed and in my free time:My View - Mailer-Project Bug-Tracker
What do you think about such payment models? Good or bad?